Senator John Fetterman broke with Democratic Party leadership this week, signaling his support for voter identification laws. The Pennsylvania Democrat said he does not view showing ID to vote as unreasonable.
This statement has immediately set him apart from Senate leaders such as Chuck Schumer and Hakeem Jeffries, who have labeled voter ID requirements as a form of voter suppression.
“As a Democrat, I do not believe that it’s unreasonable to show ID just to vote,” Fetterman said. “It’s not a radical idea for regular Americans to show your ID to vote, and those things are not Jim Crow or anything.”
The senator referenced Wisconsin’s elections, where voters approved voter ID measures while simultaneously electing a liberal state Supreme Court justice. He argued that voter identification laws do not inherently benefit one party over another and that Democrats should not treat the concept as politically toxic.
Fetterman’s comments come as the Senate faces a tense standoff over Department of Homeland Security funding and as Republicans push to attach election integrity provisions to must-pass spending legislation.
Republicans, led by President Donald Trump, are pressing for passage of the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require documentary proof of U.S. citizenship—such as a birth certificate or passport—to register to vote in federal elections. Trump has called on Senate Republicans to resurrect the “standing filibuster,” an older, more grueling procedure that forces senators to physically speak on the floor to block legislation, rather than rely on the modern “silent” version that stalls bills without debate.
“America’s elections are rigged, stolen, and a laughingstock all over the world,” Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. “We are either going to fix them, or we won’t have a country any longer.”
Senate Majority Leader John Thune confirmed that the GOP is weighing whether to adopt the tactic, but emphasized that no final decision has been made. Thune said such a procedural change would demand significant time on the Senate floor, limiting bandwidth for other priorities such as the farm bill, artificial intelligence legislation, and infrastructure funding. “We’ll discuss it within our conference,” Thune told reporters. “But we have to consider the broader implications.”
Fetterman also linked the debate over election integrity to the ongoing fight over border enforcement, saying he wants to ensure that the Department of Homeland Security remains funded and focused on deporting criminal aliens. “Hopefully, we don’t have to pay the TSA people and everyone securing our border and focus on deporting those kinds of criminals wherever they are,” he said. “I never want to vote to shut our government down again.”
Although Fetterman reiterated that he does not support the SAVE Act itself, his acknowledgment that voter ID is reasonable marks a significant cultural shift within the Democratic Party. Polls show the issue enjoys overwhelming bipartisan support. A 2025 Quantus Insights survey found that 74 percent of Americans—including 61 percent of Democrats—support requiring photo identification to vote.
Fetterman’s position contrasts sharply with that of Representative Adam Schiff, who appeared the same morning on ABC’s “This Week” to accuse Republicans of “preparing to cheat” in upcoming elections. Schiff warned that GOP-led election reforms, including voter ID and citizenship verification, represent an “authoritarian” effort to suppress votes and undermine democracy. “They are setting the stage to delegitimize elections they lose and justify actions to retain power,” Schiff said.
Republicans dismissed Schiff’s remarks as baseless fearmongering. Election integrity advocates noted that nearly every developed democracy—from Canada to France—requires some form of voter identification. They argued that Democrats routinely condemn GOP questions about ballot handling or registration irregularities as “election denial,” while themselves making unsubstantiated claims about Republican misconduct.
President Trump has maintained that securing elections through voter ID, proof of citizenship, and transparent counting procedures is essential to restoring confidence in the system. “Elections should be simple, secure, and transparent,” he said recently. “That vision doesn’t threaten democracy—it protects it.”