When a gunman opened fire during a Mass at a Minneapolis Catholic school, killing two and injuring seventeen, the tragedy shocked Minnesota and reignited debates over school safety. But for Catholic leaders in the state, the attack felt less like an unforeseen disaster and more like a grim confirmation of warnings they had raised years earlier.
A resurfaced letter sent to Governor Tim Walz in April 2023 reveals that Catholic and nonpublic school advocates had already sounded the alarm about the vulnerabilities of their institutions. The correspondence, signed by Jason Adkins, executive director of the Minnesota Catholic Conference, and Tim Benz, president of MINNDEPENDENT, a private school advocacy group, urged state leaders to act before it was too late.
“Our schools are under attack,” the letter read. “The urgent and critical need to make sure our schools are secure and safe cannot be overstated.”
The requests, however, went largely unanswered — and two years later, the exact fears the leaders had laid out became reality.
The Original Warning
The April 14, 2023, letter was written just days after the devastating mass shooting at Covenant Christian School in Nashville, where six lives were lost, including those of three children. Adkins and Benz argued that the attack underscored the unique risks faced by religious and nonpublic schools across the country.
“The latest school shooting at a nonpublic Christian school in Tennessee sadly confirms what we already know – our schools are under attack,” the letter warned.
The leaders stressed that Minnesota’s 72,000 students in Catholic, Jewish, Christian, Muslim, and independent schools were no less vulnerable than those in Tennessee. They cited not only the Nashville tragedy but also an uptick in threats against faith-based schools within Minnesota itself.
“In Minnesota, nonpublic schools, particularly our Jewish and Muslim schools, have experienced increased levels of threats, all of which we must take very seriously,” they wrote.
Funding Disparities
At the heart of their plea was a concern that nonpublic schools were being systematically excluded from state-level security initiatives.
Minnesota had established a $50 million Building and Cyber Security Grant Program and expanded its Safe Schools Program, both of which offered support for security upgrades, emergency preparedness, mental health services, and response training. Yet, according to Adkins and Benz, nonpublic schools — which educate nearly one in ten Minnesota students — were excluded from the programs.
By leaving these schools out, the leaders argued, the state was effectively leaving tens of thousands of children without adequate protection.
“It should not matter whether a child attends a public or private school. Their safety is equally important, and the state has an obligation to ensure it,” they insisted.
A Tragedy Foretold
Two years later, when an armed attacker targeted a Catholic school during Mass, the warning carried new weight. Witnesses recalled chaos as students and faculty scrambled for cover in a place long considered a sanctuary.
Authorities later confirmed that two individuals were killed, with at least seventeen others injured. Survivors described a scene of terror but also of resilience, as teachers shielded students and first responders rushed into the building within minutes.
Governor Walz, in a press briefing, called the attack “an unthinkable tragedy.” But for Catholic leaders, the incident was not unthinkable at all. It was, in their view, the very outcome they had feared when they wrote their 2023 letter.
Renewed Criticism of State Leaders
The resurfacing of the letter has sparked criticism of Walz and his administration for failing to act decisively when the concerns were raised. Advocates argue that if resources had been made available sooner, security upgrades — such as reinforced doors, surveillance systems, and professional safety staff — might have deterred or mitigated the attack.
Adkins, speaking in the aftermath, expressed sorrow but also frustration. “We should not have to be standing here saying, ‘We told you so.’ We warned that our schools were vulnerable. We asked for help. We begged for resources. And here we are.”
Benz echoed that sentiment, calling the shooting “a preventable tragedy.”
Broader Context: School Safety Across the Nation
The Minnesota debate reflects a larger national struggle over how best to protect schools, both public and private, from escalating threats. According to federal data, 2023–2024 saw one of the highest numbers of school shooting incidents on record.
Religious schools, in particular, face additional risks, often becoming targets not only of random violence but also of ideologically motivated attacks. In recent years, both Jewish and Christian schools have reported threats linked to antisemitism, anti-Christian bias, or political extremism.
Despite the risks, many faith-based schools operate on smaller budgets than public schools and often rely on tuition or parish support. That financial gap makes it difficult to fund advanced security measures without outside assistance.
The Debate Over State Responsibility
Supporters of extending public funding to private and religious schools argue that safety should not be contingent on where a child is enrolled. Critics, however, worry that state dollars could be redirected away from public schools if private institutions are included in safety grants.
Governor Walz has previously defended the state’s allocation of funds, noting that the constitution places primary responsibility on states to maintain public school systems. But after the recent tragedy, lawmakers from both parties are re-examining whether security should be considered an exception.
“Every student, regardless of what kind of school they attend, deserves to be safe in their classroom,” said one Republican legislator, promising to introduce new legislation that would extend grant eligibility to private institutions.
Survivors’ Voices
Perhaps the most compelling arguments now come from the survivors themselves. Students who fled the attack described confusion at why their school, unlike many public ones, lacked certain protections. Parents, too, are demanding answers.
“My daughter’s life was put at risk because her school didn’t have the same security resources as others,” one mother said at a community vigil. “That should never happen again.”
Moving Forward
As Minnesota grapples with the aftermath, the resurfaced letter has become a rallying point for advocates pressing for change. The Catholic Conference has renewed its call for equitable security funding, and interfaith coalitions are joining the effort.
“This is not just about Catholic schools,” Adkins emphasized. “It’s about all nonpublic schools. It’s about every child in Minnesota. We cannot afford to leave them vulnerable any longer.”
Whether the tragedy will finally prompt the sweeping reforms leaders requested back in 2023 remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: for many families, the cost of inaction has already been paid in lives lost and trauma endured.
Conclusion
The letter Catholic leaders sent to Governor Walz in 2023 now reads like a chilling prophecy. It warned of the very dangers that would later unfold and pleaded for state support to prevent them. The fact that those pleas went unanswered has sparked grief, anger, and renewed urgency in Minnesota.
As communities mourn, the debate over how best to protect schools — public and private alike — has returned to the forefront. For advocates, the message is simple: “We told you our schools were under attack. Now, will you listen?”